Tuesday, November 1, 2011

Integrated Sessions - Mod II

Session 1: Nov 2, 2011

Assignment
**********************************
Use the model for beef demand estimated in DMD 4 to answer the following questions:

1. The data set contains economic variables that explain to varying degrees the quantity of beef demanded.  List three non-economic variables that you believe influence the quantity demanded for beef.
Ans: Consumer preference for beef as food, health benefits of eating beef, Madcow disease, 


2. Use the model estimated to calculate the point elasticity of demand, income elasticity of demand and cross price elasticity. Note: Use the average values for prices, income and consumption in the point elasticity formulae. Describe the market for beef in terms of these calculated elasticities.  Is your computed price elasticity consistent with our discussion of the optimal pricing rule?
Ans
Using the model: BeefConsump=97.80–0.15*RealBeefPrice+0.36*RealChickenPrice+0.0003*RealDPI
(BeefConsum = Q or Qb ; RealBeefPrice = Pb; RealChickenPrice = Pc and RealDPI = I)


so, Q=97.80–0.15*Pb+0.36*Pc+0.0003*I
Pb (avg) = 185.36; Pc(avg) = 85; I(avg)= 11061
Q = 97.8 - 0.15*185.36 + 0.36*85 + 0.0003*11061 = 103.9 ~ 104


Point elasticity of demand, Q = dQ/dPb * Pb/Q
dQ/dPb =  -0.15 
PED = -0.15 * 185.36/104 = -0.26735 (relatively inelastic)


Cross price elasticity, % change in Q / % change in Pc
elasticity (b,c) = dQ/dPc * Pc/Q
dQ/dPc = 0.36 
elasticity (b,c) = 0.36* 85/104 = 0.294231 -> the goods are substitutes


Income elasticity of demand, %change in Q / %change in I
elasticity(b,I) = dQ/dI * I/Q
elasticity(b,I) = 0.0003 * 11061/104 = 0.031907 => normal good 


3. Using the average chicken price and average real disposable income, calculate the revenue maximizing price in the market for beef using the model estimated.
Ans: With Pc=85; I=11061;
Q = (97.8 + 0.36*85 + 0.0003*11061) - 0.15Pb
Q = 131.7 - 0.15Pb
P = 878.12 - 6.67Q
TR = P*Q
TR = 878.12 - 6.67Q^2
TR(max) is attained when MR=0 => dTR/dQ = 0

dTR/dQ = 878.12 - 2*6.67Q
(solving for =0)
Q = 65.82
P = 439

4. Compute the level of per capita beef consumption at the price calculated in Question 3.

    1. What is the range of sales volume at that price that can be expected at the 95% prediction interval?
    2. What are some strategic implications of this information for the beef industry?
    3. What are some of operating implications of the 95% prediction interval for large food supermarkets? For example, how might the ordering activities or inventory forecasts be affected?
    4. Are there any operating implications for the sales of different cuts of beef (e.g., chuck, sirloin and tenderloin)?

AnsQ = 65.82
a) For the range of sales in the 95% prediction interval I can say that the beef consumption will be between 54 - 77
which is 65.82 +- 2(5.85)  {coming from the regression model}
confidence interval 66 +- (5.85/sqrt(36))
b)

**********************************
Class Notes:

Discussion on the regression model that was discussed in the DMD class
R-square of

Robert Ng comes in :P
Marketing perspectives about demand forecasting

----------------------------------------------------------

Case: Cambridge Software company




Thursday, October 27, 2011

Marketing Management - MKT

Marketing Management - MKT


Robert Ng


Session 2: Oct 27, 2011


Case: Zipcar
See the frameworks to do a sanity check on your business idea before going ahead.

Session 3: Nov 1, 2011








Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Introduction to Financial Management - FIN

Introduction to Financial Management - Prof. Kathleen T. Hevert, Tomasso 222, 781.239.4630, EMAIL
hevert@babson.edu, Monday and Wednesday 1-3 p.m. and by appointment

Session 1: Oct 24, 2011
Google IPO case


Session 2: Oct 26t, 2011
Chapter 4: TVM



q1 q2 q3 q4 q5 q6
PV 100 ($46,650.74) -2960.4 -7225 0 0 -400
i 5% 10% 14% 8% 6% 4% 4%
N 20 8 4 7.63246072 19.99872146 18 17
PMT -2175 -400 -400
46650.73802
FV 265.3297705 100000 5000 13000 80000
FV ($265.33) $10,258.17 $10,258.17

q7 7%
0 1 2 3
300 400 150 200 ($300.00) ($373.83) ($131.02) ($163.26)
$968.11 ($968.11)

q8
a b c d e f
period beg balance payment interest principal reduction end balance PV 5000
1 5000 ($1,905.26) $350.00 ($1,555.26) $3,444.74 i 7%
2 3444.741672 ($1,905.26) $241.13 ($1,664.13) $1,780.62 N 3
3 1780.61526 ($1,905.26) $124.64 ($1,780.62) $0.00 FV 0
PMT ($1,905.26)




------------------------------------------------


Session 4: Oct 31, 2011
Beta calculation and implications

beta is a forward looking measure. It is not for historical data, we use beta for forward/future projections.
BUT in order to calculate it we use the regression on historical data.
when we look at teh regression line of the stock price to the SnP index we get the beta against the SnP (considering SnP is teh "market")

Risk free rate
for class discussion - Long term risk free rate with long term spread (long term treasury bond rate ~ 3.7%)
Equity analysts will be using the short term at times.

class question 1:
D0 = $1.2
g = 3%
beta (V) = 1.4
rRF = 4.5%
rRPM = 6%
Price, P0 = ?
Price, P2 = ?

rs = rRF + beta * rRPM = 4.5% + (6% * 1.4) = 12.9%
P0 = D1/(rs - g) = D0(1+g)/(rs - g) = 1.2(1.03)/(.129-0.3) = $12.48

class question 2:
solution in excel sheet

question 3:
IMPORTANT (look at teh solution)


Session 5: Nov 2, 2011
Case: valuing Wal-mart 2010


Facts:
P0 = $53.48
D0 = $1.09
rRF= 3.68%
P/E = 14.7
EPS= $3.72 / $3.71   (NI/#shares)
D1 = 1.21


Assumption:
MRP = 5.5%
beta = 0.66

growth in Div(perp) = 5%
r (Ks) ~= 7% (rate of return)
earnings growth (next 5 years) = 10.4%

Value Wal-Mart

a) Constant growth
P0 = D1/(rs - g)
     = 3.72*1.104 *(.30) / (7% - 5%)  { assuming the dividend payout ration of 30% exhibit 3}
     = $61.6
OR= 1.21/(7% - 5%)
     = $60.5

b) Dividends for next 3 years (using g=5%) 
0              1              2             3            4
|------------|-----------|-----------|----------|
               1.21        1.27        1.33        1.40

P3 = 1.4/(.07-.05) = 70.04
P0 = 1.21/(1.07) + 1.27/(1.07^2)  + 1.33/(1.33^3) + 70.04/(1.07^3)
     = $60.5

c) P/E approach
trailing P/E
forward P/E (today's price / expected earnings)

-> average trailing P/E from competitors = 15.5
trailing earning = 3.72
15.5 * 3.72 = $57.51

->average forward P/E from all competitors = 12.5
forward earning (3.71*1.104) = 4.11
12.5*4.11 = $51.29

Law - LAW

Law - Ross D. Petty


Session 2: Oct 26th, 2011
Sunbeam case

Final Exam



Question 1
Since Carol and I are confident about the new system being a good business opportunity I will try to take some measures before pursuing it. There is a threat that as soon as we bring in this technology into the market there will be some copycats that can come up with similar solutions. Even if we try to hide our research work for this “invention” someone can try to reverse engineer our system and come up with something similar.  The options that I have for that matter are:
·         Apply for a patent for the new technology
·         Keep the new technology as a trade secret and continue selling it.
There are certain pros and cons of taking either of the approaches and I will discuss them here before I put in my recommendation.
Going for a patent:
Pros: We can apply for a patent if the system is new and we have proof that it is not just an idea and we have made it work. In my opinion we fulfill the eligibility criteria of filing in a patent. The idea is new and we have a working model for our idea. The process (method of making and the method of using) is also well defined. A patent can secure quite some earnings for us in the future because if we have our patent approved for atleast 10 years we will be the only supplier in the market for the next 10 years. I see great potential in the market for this new system and if we are able to enjoy a monopoly for the next 10 years we can reap great financial benefits.
Cons: A few drawbacks of applying for the patent are that it will take quite some time for the patent to get approved and the paperwork will delay our time to reach the market as well. Moreover this will be an additional cost that will be a burden for a small company like ours. We already are tight on cash and an additional cost of applying for the patent will have to be deeply thought of, before we go ahead with it. Moreover, if the patent is approved our technology will be available to the rest of the world to develop further on. Although they will not be able to come up with something similar for the next 10 years (assumption for the time of patent) but they can also propose enhancements or improved technologies during this period. This is a major threat.
Trade secret:
The other option is to keep it as a trade secret and continue with the business plan and selling.
Pros: This will be a less costly approach and will reduce the other hassle of filing in the patent and fighting for it. Moreover, we will not be releasing the details of the new system to the rest of the world so this somewhat protects us in a way that the new innovators will not be able to use our work for further enhancements.
Cons: The drawbacks of this approach are that we will have to use strict measures within our company not to have the details of the new system leaked. Our agreements with the partners and employees will need to have specific non disclosure agreements which ensure that the trade secret remains intact.
Recommendation: My recommendation for this system will be to keep it as a trade secret for the first year at least and then later apply for the patent if needed. Reason being it is difficult to bear the cost at the moment without knowing the market. As soon as a good deal is signed off with a customer we should go on to have this technology patented.


Question 2
When we are hiring Jen Raul as a new sales person we need to consider that she has an accent but is generally understandable. As far as legal implications are concerned we cannot discriminate anyone because of the accent. This is similar to hiring someone from a different ethnic group or disability. The law provides the disabled and people from different ethnicities to have an equal right to the employment. So for that matter we cannot deny Jen the job position only because of the accent. The selection criterion of course has to be the existing relationships that the new candidate has in the car industry and the sales experience. Jen is a suitable candidate for this job based on this criterion. However, we need to see if her accent has some implications on the customers and the fulfillment of service. If there are some implications then we need to make required adjustments.
Moreover, when hiring Jen we need to go make an employment contract that describes her complete employment benefits, details of her acting as an agent for the company. We need to have Jen sign an NDA that the trade secrets of the company will not be taken out even after she leaves the company. The liabilities and the implications on the company of her actions need to be well defined in the contract as well. Since we are hiring Jen as our “agent” the liability will be there anyway.


Question 3
The next step is to finalize the sales contract with the proposed clients and partners. For the sales contract the following needs to be considered and taken care of:
·         Final terms after the negotiation should be clearly written and signed off by both the parties.
·         Requirement of the NDA for the other party to be clearly stated and signed.
·         Sales transaction details, commissions and payment terms should be clearly stated.
·         The geography to which the contract is applicable should also be clearly defined.
·         Details of the liabilities should be clearly stated as well. How will each party will be liable for the sold system during and after the sale.
·         Term of the contract should be clearly agreed upon and the implications on each party after the term should be written down.
·         There should be a clause to handle the situation in case of a dispute.
·         Details of termination of the contract should be part of it as well along with the implications on each party for the termination.


Question 4:
The accident has a number of legal implications and since Carol has confessed that the system does not work flawlessly and there is a possibility of it misunderstanding the directions. This can result in lawsuits. But before I go ahead, I will point out certain facts that can go in the favor of our company. The system actually did not completely misunderstand the direction. A possible reason of it malfunctioning was Jen’s accent. As stated earlier Jen pronounces “L” as “R” at times so when she said “Baguette Lite” in her accent the system understood it as “Backup Right” which caused the accident.
Having said that; this does not give us enough reasoning to defend this case. If we had a clause or disclaimer which stated that the system works with a particular (American/Northeastern/Texan) accent then we would have been in a better position to defend this case. GM rep can suit us at two different levels.
1.      At a company level: making an argument that we did not disclose all relevant information about the system before the contract was signed.
2.      At personal level: for the physical injury that has been caused to him because of the malfunctioning of the system. This lawsuit will be pretty strong since a physical injury has occurred.
Expected results:
We will have to face the above mentioned lawsuits and the results are expected to go against us. We will have to pay substantial amount to the person lawsuit and our new technology will most probably be banned. At the company level lawsuit I foresee that this can defame GM in a way as well since they were going to sign a contract with us without rigorous testing. So there is a possibility that this can be settled out of court.
What could have we done to avoid this: Ideally the system should have gone through further testing before bringing into the market. There can be many design changes which can avoid the possible injuries but following are the recommendations that could have saved us from the possible lawsuits:
·         Putting up a disclaimer on the functionality of the voice recognition algorithm running in the system. Clearly stating how it works with certain accents.
·         Clearly stating how the wrong accent or wrong directions can result in severe injuries.
·         Having a waiver signed by the sales reps before giving the test drive to any of the sales representatives of the potential customers. Clearly mentioning that the system is in test phase and can be further customized and finalized after the sales deal.
·         Including any repercussions of Jen’s accent as a personal liability and not company’s liability in the employment contract that we sign with Jen. [or limited liability to the company]



Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Managerial Economics - ECN7302

Managerial Economics (ECN7302) - Megan Way, mway@babson.edu, x5892


Session 1: Oct 25th, 2011


Economics: Study allocation of scarce resources.
Economic systems are set up to allocate scarce resources

  • Centralized common control (USSR, North Korea)
  • Mixed market
    • We let the market function
    • give regulation, provisioning of some goods etc.
  • Free market  
questions:
  1. What is produced?
  2. How is it produced?
  3. Who is it produced for?

Individuals are trying to maximize - utility
Firms are trying to maximize - profits
Govts are trying to maximize - welfare

Consumers:
Rational choice, we assume rational.
Traditional economics assume that people are rational., (There is new concept of behavioral economics in which people somewhat do not behave rationally)

Utility:
satisfaction, happiness, value to consumer
Marginal utility:- utility from teh next unit of teh good
Diminishing MU:- more consumed in a time period lowers the utility of teh next unit.
How do we measure utility: by either bringing in units like "Util" OR we rank it against something else

Maximizing utility subject to:

  • preferences - 
    • assume that they are complete (you will never say i dont know)
    • assume that the preferences are transitive
    • assume that "more is better"
    • assume (preferences are stable over time)
  • income
  • prices of all goods
Then we move to the discussion of indifference curves for the utility. See page 5 of lecture notes.
Bring in the budget constraint now.
The budget constraint is a straight line with decreasing slope when drawn with Price of Q1 on y and price of Q2 on y.
Draw an indifference curve on top of the budget constraint line. Move to the point where indifference curve is tangent to the budget constraint line. 

At equilibrium (when you have maximized utility) your MRS (marginal rate of substitution) will be = -Px/Py [only at equilibrium]
otherwise marginal rate of substitution MRS = delta Qy/ delta Qx 

What can you as a marketing person to influence the equilibrium point.
either change the price to change the slope of the budget contraint line. OR do advertisement to change the utility curve.


Session 2: Oct 27, 2011


Discussion on the assignment.


Session 3; Nov 1, 2011
Assignment



1.      Mr. Smith has the following demand equation for a certain product:
Q = 30 - 2P.
a)      At a price of $7, what is the point elasticity?
Ans: P=7 => Q = 30 - 14 = 16
point elasticity = dQ/dP * P/Q
dQ/dP = -2
P/Q (at P=7) = 7/16
PED = -7/8 = -0.87

Interpretation: if i raise the price by 1% the quantity demanded will go down by 0.87%


b)      Between prices of $5 and $6, what is the arc elasticity?
Ans: at P=5; Q=20 and at P=6; Q=18
E = delta Q / delta P * (P1 +P2) / (Q1+Q2) ; (20-18)/(-1)*(6+5)/(18+20) = -11/19 = -0.579
Interpretation: if i raise the price by 1% the quantity demanded will go down by 0.579%


c) If the market is made up of 100 individuals with demand curves identical to Mr. Smith’s, what are the point and arc elasticities for the conditions specified in parts a and b?
no change
Interpretation: because the elasticities are calculated in terms of %ages, we have eliminated the number of products sold from our equation that way.




2.      Deck & Blacker (DB) makes small kitchen appliances.  DB hired a consulting economist to estimate the demand for toaster ovens.  The consultant used data gathered from DB’s sample market survey.




Qx =    40   -   1.1Px   +   0.1Pc   +   0.32I   +   1.5Ax

                    (2.06)     (.06)       (.003)        (4.31)          (.5)






Qx is the quantity demanded in thousands;  Px is the price in dollars;  Pc is the price of leading competitor; I is the mean household income, measured in thousands;  Ax is the company advertising expenditure (measured in thousands of dollars).  (Note: The figures in parenthesis are standard errors of the coefficients.  The regression analysis also provided the coefficient of determination, which is 0.75.  This information can be omitted in answering the questions below.)



The current values of the independent variables are:  Px = 55; Pc = 50; Ax = 20; and I = 31.  Please answer the following questions:






a) Current level of sales, Qx , is: 40 - 1.1(55) + 0.1(50) + 0.32(31) + 1.5(20) = 24.42
b) point elasticity = -1.1* 55/24.42 = -2.4 (if i lower my price by 1% quantity demanded will go up by 2.4% so yes we should consider lowering the price for higher revenues.
c) What is the total revenue maximizing price for Deck & Blacker toaster ovens?  Graph the demand and marginal revenue curves.  Plot the revenue maximizing price and output.
Ans: Qx = f(Px,Pc,I,A)
        Qx= f(Px) (keeping all teh rest of the variables constant)
        Qx= 40 - 1.1(Px) + 0.1(50) +32(31) =1.5(20)
        Qx = 84.92 - 1.1Px
        Qmax = 84.92
=> P = 77.2 - 0.91Qx

Total Revenue, TR = P * Q
TR = (77.2 - 0.91Qx)*Qx
TR = 77.2Qx - 0.91Qx^2
dTR/dQx = 77.2 - 2(0.91)Qx
dTR/dQx = 77.2 - 1.82Qx
Marginal Revenue = dTR/dQx
Total revenue is maximum at the tangent when MR = 0
So, put dTR/dQx = MR = 0 and solve for Qx
77.2 - 1.82Qx = 0
-> Qx (max) = 48.46




d) How concerned should DB be about price discounts by its leading competitor?  Explain.
Ans: Price demand by competitor
cross Price elasticity % delta Qb / % delta Pc
elasticity(x,c) = dQ/dPc * Pc/Q
                    = (0.1)*(50/24.42) = 0.2

elasticity (xc) < 0 complements
elasticity (xc) > substitutes 
this implies that teh two products are substitutes
So, if the competitor gives the discount WE SHOULD be concerned

e) How concerned should DB be about the prediction that the country is slipping into a recession?
Ans: We should be looking at teh income elasticity
elasticity(I) = % delta Q / % delta I = dQ/dI * I/Q = 0.32 * (31/24.42) = 0.406

elasticity(I) > 0 - normal good
elasticity(I) < 0 inferior good
elasticity(I) > 1 luxury good ~ superior good
this implies that since this is a normal good, recession will have a negative effect on our sales->revenues
as

f) How effective do you think advertising is for this company?
Ans: elasticity(A) = %delta Q / % delta A = dQ/dA * A/Q = 1.5 * (20/24.42) = 1.23

say A1 = 20,000 and A2 = 20,200 (1% increase)
-> Q1 = 24,420 and Q2=(1.0123)*Q1 = 24,720
so this means that an increase of $200 of advertising gives us 300 units of additional sales
lets see the effect on revenue
TR = P*Q
delta TR = 55*300 = 16,500
so this implies an extra spending of $300 will give us an additional revenue of $16,500

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Cost calculations:
Lets say we have Marginal Cost, MC or $20
if we have MC=$20
so to maximize profit, we put MR = MC
77.2 - 1.82Qx = 20
=> Qx = 31.43 this teh quantity which will give us teh maximum profit.
we can get teh price for this quantity
P = 77.2 - 0.91*(31.43)
   =  $ 48.6
Rule: Profit maximization - MC = MR

Consumer surplus:



There are externalities as well. There are spill overs.
See lecture notes on externalities.

Session 4: Nov 3, 2011


Production and cost theory
Production function, Q = f|(K,L)
K refers to fixed capital, its not just the $

short run vs the long run
short run = time period in which at least one input is fixed
long run = all inputs vary

Q = Total product (TP)
APL = TP/L = Q/L
MPL = delta TP/ delta L = delta Q / delta L

Diminishing Marginal Returns: As you add variable input to a fixed input you hit point where variable input is less productive

W/APL = Avg cost
e.g. W/APL Germany < W/APL Greece (even though the wages are higher  in Germany)

Cost Terminology
Accounting costs: explicit
Economic costs: explicit + implicit
explicit: monetary outlays
implicit: foregone earnings (opportunity costs)
implicit: what you could earn with the next best use of your resources

sunk cost:

anything that increases productivity decreases cost
SO the cost functions and the productions are a mirror image of each other.
Total Cost Tc = FC + VC
ATC = TC/Q  ;  AFC  FC/Q  ; AVC = VC/Q  ; MC = delta TC / delta Q

Profits = (P-ATC)*Q
Breakeven point = where MC intersects the ATC
Shutdown rule P<AVCmin

shutdown point is the minimum AVC


Session 5: Nov 8, 2011



1.      Little Dolls Corp. is considering the installation of plant and equipment to manufacture talking dolls.  It has a choice of three plant sizes A, B, and C.  The average cost schedules for these plants are shown below.  Also shown is the estimated probability of demand for each of the first two years.

Output Level
Demand Probability
Expected Demand
Average Cost Level $
Plant A      Expected ACA       Plant B        Expected ACB    Plant C       Expected ACc
1000
0.10
100 
110
11000 
140
14000 
180
18000 
2000
0.20
400 
90
 36000
100
40000 
110
 44000
3000
0.35
 1050
80
 84000
70
73500 
80
 84000
4000
0.20
 800
80
 64000
60
48000 
50
40000 
5000
0.10
 500
90
 45000
70
 35000
40
20000 
6000
0.05
 300
110
 33000
90
 27000
50
15000 



















a)      Comment on the existence of economies and diseconomies of plant size, if any, in this company.  Graph the cost curves.
b)      Calculate the expected value of average cost for each plant and expected value of quantity demanded given the probability distribution.  Note: Expected value is:
Σ Xi Pi , where Xi is an individual outcome and Pi is the probability of that outcome.
c)      Which plant size would you recommend to the management of Little Dolls Corp.?  Support your answer by explicitly addressing the assumptions and decision criteria used in your recommendation. Would you change your recommendation regarding the optimal plant size if you knew that a relatively conservative management runs this company?
d)      Given the plant size you have recommended, how much excess capacity will Little Dolls Corp. have?



-----------------------------------------------------------
Class notes:
Full capacity = when MC begins to rise above ATC. This will be when the ATC is minimum, this will the most efficient point. 

ATC = SRAC (short run average cost)

LRAC (Long run average cost): least cost of production at any output level when all inputs are variable. That is its called Planning curve. 


Session 6: Nov 10,2011


Salem Telephone company
Variable costs:
Power - $4.7/hr
hourly staff - $ 24.00
AVC = 28.7

(P-AVC) contribution
800-28.7 = 771.30 (hourly cont commercial)
400-28.7 = 371.30 (hourly cont intra-company)
Total fixed cost = 212,000 (add all except the variable costs)
Total fixed cost not covered by intra-company sales
= 212000 - 205(400 - 28.7)
= 136,900

break-even quantity, Q = 136,900/(800-28.7) = 177 hours

------------------------------------
Lets calculate elasticities for Salem
Arc elasticity
P1 = 800, P2 = 1000
Q1 = 138, Q2 = 97
Arc elasticity = -1.57021 (in the elastic range)

P2 = 600
Q2 = 179
Arc elasticity = -0.9 (in the inelastic range)

For
TR =


Session 7: Nov 15, 2011


Degree of Operating leverage
DOL = % change in profit / % change in Q

assuming no pricing power and constant AVC
=> profit = (P-AVC) * delta Q / (P-AVC-AFC) * Q
                = (P-AVC)

if operating leverage is higher .. you have higher profit potential after the breakeven point but at the same time below the breakeven point the loss potential is also higher.

Externalities


Negative externality - cost is borne by society.

Session 12: Dec 1, 2011

Value Pricing in Domestic and International Markets


1.      Palm has identified Europe and Asia as two new areas of potential market entry for its new Palm tungsten T PDA model.  Estimated demand equations for these two markets, respectively, are:

QE = 400,000 – 444.44 PE                   and      QA = 790,622 – 1,090.51 PA

For simplicity assume that transportation and other international transactions costs are negligible, and that free trade exists among all the countries in these areas and the US.  On the manufacturing side, the same cost conditions apply to these markets as well, with a constant AVC of $220 per unit.

Palm has decided to pursue a price discrimination policy that supports short-run profit maximization (skimming) for each of the two new markets.  Use this information to calculate the profit-maximizing quantities and prices for Europe and Asia.  (In calculating coefficients, please use five decimal places).


VC = AVC*Q
VC = 220Q
MC = dVC/dQ = 220


For Europe
Pe = 900 - 0.00225Q
MR = 900 - 0.0045Q


at profit maximization MR = MC
900 - 0.0045Q = 220
Qe = 151,109
Pe = 560


Contribution:
per unit:560 - 220 = 340
total = 51,377,060


Asia


Pa = 725 - 0.0009Q
MR = 725 - 0.0018Q


at MR = MC
725 - 0.0018Q = 220
Qa = 275,354
Pa = 474
Contribution/unit: 474 - 220 = 254
total: 69,939,916
Total Asia and Europe = 120,643,627
--------------
part b)
combined demand equation:
Q = 1190622 - 1535P
P = 776 - 0.0006Q
MR = 776 - 0.0013Q
MR = MC
776 - 0.0013Q = 220
Q = 427,438
P = 497.84


Contribution: 497.84 - 220 = 277.84
total cont = 118,759,373.92
-----------------------



2.      TLC Lawn Care, Inc. provides fertilizer and weed control lawn services to residential customers.  Its seasonal service package, regularly priced at $250, includes several chemical spray treatments.  As part of an effort to expand its customer base, TLC offered $50 off its regular price to customers in the Wellesley area.  The response was enthusiastic, with sales rising to 5,750 units from the 3,250 units sold in the same period last year.
a.       Calculate the arc price elasticity of demand for TLC service.

Assume that the arc price elasticity (from part a.) is the best available estimate of the point price elasticity of demand.  If marginal cost is $135 per unit for labor and material, calculate TLC’s optimal markup on price and its optimal price.  Comment on TLC’s current prices.


P1 = 250
P2 = 200
Q1 = 3,250
Q2 = 5,750


elasticity = [delta Q / delta P ]*[(P1+P2)/(Q1+Q2)]
elasticity = -2.5


Assume that the arc price elasticity (from part a.) is the best available estimate of the point price elasticity of demand.  If marginal cost is $135 per unit for labor and material, calculate TLC’s optimal markup on price and its optimal price.  Comment on TLC’s current prices.
M (Optimal markup) =[ -1/(1 - |elasticity|)]*MC 
1 + M = E/(1+E)
TLC arc E = -2.5
1+M = -2.5/(1-2.5) = 1.667
M = 0.667
M = 66.7%


MC = 135
M = 66.7%


Session 14: Dec 6, 2011


Case; P&G - Wal-mart partnership


Diaper market:
Characteristics - elasticity
Luxury vs necessity - inelastic
number of substitutes - cloth - inelastic
% of budget - relatively high - elastic
Time frame


Market structure
- Differentiated
- # of firms - few (3-4)
- Barriers to Entry - high, R&D, high FC, economies of scale, distribution, brand
- Pricing power - decide their own price
- Interdependence 
Oligopoly


Apply game theory on the case
Kimberly Clarke and P&G have options of either go premium or promotional pricing
P&G, KC